Human
beings for millennia have not been able to agree upon a
satisfactory definition of sanity or insanity.
That is
because we have been looking at conduct or behavior and
judging the validity of it. In a free will universe, ALL
thought and conduct is allowed, therefore, evaluating
behavior is pointless. It can be observed however, that
all insane or irrational people feel bad.
Sane or
rational behavior always occurs when a genuine feeling
of well-being is present. That is because well-being is
an innate property of consciousness itself.
Neurosis is
irrational behavior.
Psychosis
is wildly irrational and sometimes destructive,
behavior.
But what is
irrational behavior and why is it irrational? We do not
claim that behavior is irrational because it goes
against the commonly accepted range or mode of allowed
or lawful conduct. We do not base irrational behavior,
either, on whether it agrees with morals, ethics, or
religious beliefs. In a universe of free will, there can
never be unanimous agreement on any yardstick of
measurement.
We merely
observe that in all irrational or insane persons, there
is a focus upon that which is not wanted. Let me
explain.
A person
who has a disagreeable life is not a happy camper. This
person has many things in his experience which he would
rather change; but for one reason or other, cannot. The
focus of his thoughts and actions are on fighting the
unwanted condition, instead of creating the wanted
condition. This occurs because the unwanted condition
is right in your face, so you can’t help but pay
attention to it! However, the more attention is paid to
something, the greater it becomes in a person’s
experience (“what you resist persists’). This is a
consequence of the operation of the Law of Attraction
and the Law of Vibration. One naturally become more and
more frustrated when one works harder and harder and
continually fails.
An unhappy
person is not necessarily an irrational or insane
person. However, a predominant focus upon uncomfortable
things will eventually produce action based upon those
predominant thought patterns.
For
example, a person may hate the fact that he never gets
promoted in his job. Say he works as a clerk in a
department store, but three others have been promoted to
section manager ahead of him. If he focuses his thoughts
and feelings predominantly upon his resentment, then
eventually he will find a reason for his lack of
advancement. More than likely this reason will have
nothing to do with his own thought or conduct, because
no one wants to believe that they are not good enough.
Say he focuses on the obvious reason, his boss, who has
passed him over.
At first,
he is just grumpy. He complains to the boss, lightly at
first, then more strongly. He becomes angry, bad-mouths
the boss to all of his coworkers. We say this guy is
just a sourpuss and let it go at that. We say that if he
just placed his attention on getting a promotion, rather
than fighting against those whom he believes are
blocking him, he would be better off.
But if his
thoughts predominately go to fighting his boss, he will
begin to act neurotically.
A neurosis
is just a predominant focus upon that which is not
wanted. This leads to action based upon those thoughts,
and so we say this person exhibits neurotic or
irrational behavior. If, however, the predominant
thought becomes exclusive thought, now we have the
condition of psychosis.
Psychosis
is exclusive attention to that which is not wanted.
From these
simple principles, we can make sense of the idea of
sanity or insanity.
Sanity
always corresponds with feeling good. Insanity always
corresponds with feeling bad.
Anything
which encourages a good feeling can be considered sane.
Anything that encourages a bad feeling can be considered
irrational.
Therefore,
punishment is irrational.
Punishment
is itself a doubly irrational activity, for its
application, by definition, causes a bad feeling within
the offender; and its purpose being to place the
offender’s attention even more on the thing that is not
wanted.
For
example, a guy goes to jail for knifing someone. This
places his attention even more on the unwanted condition
that caused the offending action in the first place. The
offending action is irrational, but the remedy is even
worse! Punishment is a guarantor of even more irrational
behavior.
Treatment
which suppresses the cognitive function is a little
better, but still not very effective. Drugging someone
to prevent his or her attention to the unwanted
condition can never lead to a cure, only to the
suppression of symptoms.
What is
sane or insane can largely be determined by how good or
bad a person feels. It requires an intimate knowledge of
the scale of emotion/vibration. For example, one might
say that a psychotic murderer kills because it makes him
feel good. But that is an illusion. If you accurately
identify a murderer’s position on the
scale of emotion/vibration, it will always be
in the negative range. The maverick is not necessarily
irrational because he or she flouts society’s customs.
Irrationality only occurs on the lower end of the
emotional scale.
Irrationality cannot be determined solely by observing
behavior, for all sorts of what society considers
irrational activities can result from simply
'different' thoughts. Exclusive attention to a subject
isn’t necessarily bad, in fact, it can result in genius.
Look at Mozart, for example, or Bill Gates. The
determining factor in insanity is the attention to
something unwanted, instead of the creation of something
wanted. If we were to psychoanalyze our murderer, we
might eventually come to the conclusion that he hates
people because his dad beat him during childhood. Well,
so what? That doesn’t get anywhere. It doesn’t go far
enough. What is it that person really wants? If you
accept an answer like “I do it because I like it,”
you’re not even on first base yet.
Accurately
placing a person’s position on the scale of emotion is
the only reliable determinant of sanity or insanity.
Mostly our society says, “screw the murderer. Put him in
jail and let him rot, or kill him.” Well, that’s one way
I suppose. But it’s irrational!
The nutty
happy guy is no harm to anyone. Happiness means
connection to source, the spirit within. The task is
to find out what the person really wants. Even a twisted
murderer is an incarnated spirit, and that spirit is
divine.
So lets
stop pretending that punishing people is a good thing.
Punishment is irrational and psychotic, and leads to
exacerbation of the condition that is being punished.
Drugging
people is more benign, but ineffective in effecting a
real cure. Sometimes it must be used as a last resort,
but I think we can do better than that!
Sanity or
insanity is directly linked to how a person feels.
Educating a person to focus on desires, instead of
fighting adversaries, can lead to an avoidance of
irrational behavior. If we did that from childhood, our
society would be a lot higher on the scale of
emotion/vibration. It would be a lot happier, and more
productive as well. Knowledge of the scale of
emotion/vibration is essential to good parenting and
schooling. Without it, we simply judge the validity of
behavior by some artificial standard.