Science and Consciousness,
Part IV
How is it that when
consciousness focuses, i.e. a being incarnates into a physical body,
there is
always a unique personality formed?
If you observe people
closely enough, you notice that each and every person has a distinct
personality. No two human beings are exactly alike, even identical
twins. Therefore,
there is an aspect of personalitfy which is not genetically caused,
which is not
dependent upon anything physical. Those who believe that it is DNA will
argue
that the slightly different DNA in each person is what causes the
personality
difference, but this is placing the cart before the horse, as I have
already
mentioned in Science and
Consciousness part I . The
horse is conscious, and draws the cart, causes it to move , gives it a
direction, not the other way around! DNA differences are the result of
differently focused consciousness.
What do we mean when we say
consciousness is focused differently? Now that is a hell of a
good
question.
If consciousness is energy,
and I believe it is (although energy that is so refined, of such a high
frequency, that it may not be detectable), then there may be a unique
geometry
to this focused energy which causes each individual to perceive in a
different
way.
Others have advanced
theories that consciousness itself is self-reflexive; that is, able to
influence itself. The geometric shape used to describe the
self-reflexive
nature of consciousness is the torus. The torus allows a vortex of
energy to
form which bends back along itself and re-enters itself. It
'inside-outs',
continuously flowing back into itself. Thus the energy of a torus is
continually refreshing itself, continually influencing itself. Some
amazing
work has been done over the years by a controversial guy named Dan
Winter
(whose books are now out of print), who suggests with geometric
diagrams that
the only way self-reflexiveness can continue without breaking down is
by using
waveforms based on harmonics of the golden section, which we have
talked about
in the Geometry section of this website. He claims our very DNA is a
helix
formed by 2 rotating geometric figures called icosahedrons and
dodecahedrons. A
guy named Stan Tenen (MERU Foundation) has also done some great
work
along these lines, contradicting Winter's work and basing his own
discoveries
on the work of Arthur Young, who also worked with the torus.
Regardless of who is
correct, the torus does seem to be the common denominator, the
self-organizing
way consciousness is designed.
The torus enables vortexes
to be formed. All torii create energy vortexes. Energy can funnel up or
down
through it; the rotating nature of a torus generates a flow of
energy
through the torus, depending upon the speed of rotation of the torus
and the
kind of torus it is (there are 3 kinds of standard torii). An
examination
of the torus shows that its very construction forms energy funnels, or
vortexes.
(1)
Figure 1 -- energy flows through the opening in the ring torus, forming
a
vortex
For example, a tornado is an
energy vortex. A tornado is actually a torus, of which we are observing
only
the top half (the bottom half is below ground level). We actually
see,
when we observe a tornado, only the atmosphere which is influenced by
the
energy which is forming the vortex. In other words, the atmosphere is
being
drawn in through the rotating funnel of the torus. The question is,
what is the
nature of the energy which forms the torus?
This energy must be very
powerful indeed, to create such a massive atmospheric effect, yet
invisible to
our eyes, because we do not perceive it.
The energy of a torus is
rotating up and down and horizontally, but always in a
circular
fashion. Actually the energy is traveling along the surface of the
torus,
through the torus, and inside the torus in a spiraling fashion
(if while
you draw a circle in any plane, and at the same time give it a third
direction out of that plane, a spiral will be formed).
All particles in the
universe are traveling in spirals, because all particles are in motion
relative
to other particles, and we do not observe straight lines in nature. It
seems
that everything in existence is traveling on a curved path. A path
which
appears to be a straight line to us is actually traveling on a curved
trajectory, with a very large radius so that we don't perceive its
curved
nature . (2)
So lets get back to our
original question: how is the energy of consciousness uniquely focused,
to form
unique personalities? Is there a geometry to consciousness? (other than
saying
it could be a torus, that is not specific enough). If so, what is the
geometry
of consciousness?
Science shows us that there
are really no continuous surfaces in nature, because when we magnify
these
surfaces, they turn out to be composed of molecules, and atoms, which
are
discontinuous. Under an electron microscope, we see division into
smaller and
smaller elements (genes, chromosomes, DNA, etc.), but these
elements are
always curved (3). So I am speculating that the standard geometric
figures,
polyhedra, are not candidates for the geometry of consciousness, if
there is
such a thing, because they are based upon straight lines.
Straight lines are
instantaneous pathways of communication between elements of a
structure.
They represent Pure Awareness (see The Creation of a Universe). Energy
cannot
exist in straight line form, it must be curved, a waveform. For
something to
have existence, it must be persistent. In order for persistence to
manifest,
there must be stops along the way, possibilities of new
direction. A
straight line does not provide this opportunity.
Instantaneity is not a
condition for existence.
However, a curved line means a
continuous change of direction. There is a certain time-lag that is
required to
negotiate the continuously new change of direction, which leads to
persistence,
and thus time. That is the reason everything in existence is curved,
and the
reason why all things are in motion relative to everything else, and
thus
travel in spirals.
Persistence, existence
itself, is curved, not straight.
The sphere/torus is
the fundamental geometric unit of this universe. (The sphere and the
torus are
made the same way. Just take a circle and rotate it around an axis such
that
the distance from the axis to the center of the circle is constant. If
you
split the circle down the middle and rotate the circle around itself,
you get a
sphere. If you place the axis anywhere but through the center of the
circle,
you get some kind of torus).
The torus can explain how
consciousness can sustain itself, how it can learn from observation and
experience and integrate that new energy into itself. But this is too
general
to account for the uniqueness of each individual personality.
Rather than focus on the
complexities of the 'geometry of consciousness', as if each individual
had a
unique energy pattern 'built in' to him or her when he or she
incarnated into a
body, rather we take the perspective that consciousness gradually
determines
this unique personality as we go along. This is not the familiar 'blank
sheet'
idea, because in that conception we are simply vessels waiting to be
filled up
with experience. There is no causative aspect assigned to a new-born,
for
instance. It is thought that babies are just little blobs, soaking up
experience from the world around them until their personalities become
developed. While this is true to a certain degree, we say here that
consciousness incarnates into a body with full knowledge of itself as
an aspect
of universal, source energy. It is relishing the opportunity to
experience
intensely. As we said before, consciousness gives up a broader
awareness
(perspective) in order to focus intensely in the physical.
In other words, a being does
not incarnate somehow truncated from its true self! Just because
consciousness
enters a body which is not fully formed, does not mean that the
consciousness
inhabiting it is in the same condition! It just appears to an outside
observer
that the child is not a causative thinker, but it really is. Of course
it is
soaking in experience from those around it, but it is always the choice
of the
consciousness inhabiting the body, to decide whether to agree with that
which
is happening around it, and mold its beliefs accordingly.
We have all known headstrong
children who will hold to their point of view no matter what the 'big
people'
say or think. This is the default condition for consciousness --
awareness of self. We won't get into the discussion of what beliefs and
goals
the incarnating consciousness comes in with -- that would be something
impossible to know and personal to each being.
But we do say that the
consciousness is learning, creating, and experiencing new things, which
gives
him or her an opportunity to develop his or her personality.
When consciousness focuses,
like the point of light from the magnifying glass, it gives up
awareness.
Consciousness is energy. A
point of light (energy) perceives far less than, say, a mist on a
cloudy
day (assuming, of course, that these things could be conscious on some
level).
The mist pervades everything within its 'body', square miles of
awareness,
whereas the point has only its little point of perception.
Therefore
there is a possibility for expansion, for growth (literally) for the
energy of
consciousness when it is focused into a body.
The development of
personality is simply the expansion of consciousness.
It is actually the
unfocusing, or broadening, of the awareness of the focused being to
encompass
more and more of life, and therefore discover true self.
That is why so much of
ancient wisdom talks about releasing, letting go, of earthbound cares
and
worries. In order to develop the personality, the being has to
experience new
things. In order to do that, a being must 'open up' to life, literally!
Now we said earlier that a
being incarnates with full knowledge of self. That seems contradictory,
for we
have also just explained how a being loses awareness during the
focusing
of consciousness.
But the point of light is always connected to the broader energy all
around it.
In fact, the point of light IS the broader energy which surrounds it,
just as
the unfocused light IS the focused light. So there really is no
separation,
even though the focused light is limited to a narrower viewpoint.
So we have come full circle,
which is appropriate when discussing consciousness. If consciousness is
circular, toroidal, then it must always come back in on itself, as we
have done
in this essay.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Torus.html, "Eric Weisstein's
World
of
Mathematics"
(2) Buckminster Fuller, 'Synergetics', sections 811 - 814.
(3) For a good idea of this, check out
http://microscopy.fsu.edu/primer/java/scienceopticsu/powersof10/index.html